|
Earle Rheaume
24 Kedgewick Court
Ottawa, Ontario
K2G 4M9 Canada
Tel: (613) 225-6269
email: earleb@sympatico.ca
December 10, 2003
It should never be
happening, but sadly it is. Some tens of thousands of Ontario's sick,
poor, disabled, homeless and destitute, are being denied their rightful
legislated benefits and rights every day. That's discrimination
and only a successful legal action will guarantee that justice will prevail.
That's were your endorsement is so important.
It happened to me
in November 2001, when I was denied my rights.
I was 62 years old
and my physical and mental conditions included depression, chronic pain
in my neck and back. I also had osteoporosis. I was unable to function
in the community because of physical and mental health issues. My CPP
provided $431.33, and was my only source of income. At the time I was
without money and unable to borrow. My prescription medication, including
anti-depressants had been used up weeks earlier. My mental state was so
impaired that I was unable, unaware or incapable of understanding, that
the Trillium quarterly deductible balance owing, was a mere $19.88.
A SBT (social benefits tribunal) hearing a few months earlier had not
yet been approved. Without those prescribed anti-depressants, a medical
emergency developed, resulting in intensified stress, anxiety and depression.
In desperation, I contacted the Ottawa ODSP office for emergency financial
assistance to purchase those anti-depressants. They directed me to the
Ontario Works EFCA Branch, of the Peoples Services in Ottawa.
I was systemically blocked, prevented and ignored. I was abused,
treated unkindly and without respect or dignity. I continued to be denied
the emergency financial support. Some fourteen days later relief finally
came. My ODSP application was finally approved and all of my medication
was obtained.
Months later, my
research discovered that all Ottawa and Ontario ministry personnel contacted,
including the minister himself, did not abide by
the Ontario Works Legislation and Regulations.
This issue is not
with the Ontario Works Legislation. It was justly developed to protect
the rights of those who need it most. The legislation and regulations
are quite simply not being followed, and are ignored by those government
officials whose duty is, to govern, according to legislation.
As a result, many
valid claims are not being heard and justice is not being done. That's
Wrong! That's unacceptable!
How important is this
issue? It affects every man, woman and child, who depend in one-way or
another, on social assistance programs.
You might ask, "How
are those senior bureaucrats and politicians getting away with this?"=>
Most of us are afraid to speak out, or to bring our problems forward
in fear of retribution of being punished, or worse, being cut-off some
or all of our benefits.
Jacques Chartrand,
a senior lawyer and Executive Director of the (Ottawa) West End Legal
Clinic had this to say in exerts from a letter to Ms. Nathalie Champagne.
She is the Ottawa Area Legal Area Director.
MEMO
To: Nathalie Champagne,
LAO
Date: August 6, 2003
From: Jacques Chartrand
Re: Earl Rheaume
"I have reviewed
the documentation he has provided me as well as the legal opinion of
Mr. Plant. He asks that I provide you with my comments although I have
not been retained by him on any matter.
As I understand
the facts, Mr. Rheaume applied for emergency prescribed medications
at ODSP (Ontario Disability Support Program) in November 2001 and they
referred him to OW (Ontario Works). Mr. Rheaume claims that his application
was not given serious consideration and basically summarily dismissed
by OW.
Although I appreciate
Mr. Plante's opinion I do not quite agree with it. I believe OW was
in breach of its statutory obligations by not meeting the prescribed
standards in its performance of its function and following the prescribed
procedures and practices (Section 39 (2)) in that:
- OW
failed to properly process his application;
- OW failed
to recognize Mr. Rheaume's disabilities and assist him accordingly;
- OW failed
to provide him with a written decision and reasons for the denial.
Mr. Rheaume could have requested an internal review and appealed a
further denial to the Social Benefits Tribunal. This process must
still be followed even if the decision is a discretionary one.
- The administrator
failed to properly exercise his discretion in the circumstances of
this case.
- As stated by
Mr. Rheaume in his Statement of Claim: The defendants owed a duty
and obligation to him and to others having similar financial needs
to ensure that the legislation (and regulations) be applied for the
purpose they were intended.
Mr. Rheaume wishes
this matter dealt with by way of action. The question is whether such
a court action is the best way to obtain the remedy he is seeking taking
into consideration such factors as time limits and the costs involved.
Further who knows what the courts will decide. As we all know there
are risks involved.
One further comment
- consideration should be given to perhaps getting the Ontario Ombudsman
involved in the circumstances of this case which may be able to resolve
and satisfy all persons concerned. I believe the Ombudsman can make
recommendations as to process and procedures and recommend reimbursements
of expenses incurred.
I hope this memo
is of assistance to you in considering on whether to issue a certificate
to Mr. Rheaume to commence his action.
All of which is
respectfully submitted".
Jacques Chartrand
Executive Director
West End Legal Services
Mr. Chartrand has agreed to cooperate and can be reached at;
Phone: 1-613-596-1641
Fax: 1-613-596-3364
Email: chartra@olap.org
Collectively your endorsement will provide a powerful stimulus when presented
to our union friends. Their financial support will ensure that sufficient
capital is available to support a serious and thorough legal challenge
in a provincial court of law.
I invite and urge
your consideration and endorsement. A brief message (on your letterhead)
is all that is needed.
Thank you in advance.
Earle
Rheaume
|