DAWN Ontario: DisAbled Women's Network Ontario

 

Questions & Answers About Electrictiy Deregulation -
from the Ontario Electricity Coalition (OEC)

February 9 , 2002


 

The Provincial Government was asked to name one jurisdiction in North America where electricity deregulation had resulted in lower prices and a more stable supply.

They couldn't answer
.

Below are 11 questions and some of the answers favoring a real, publicly owned electricity system.

Questions & Answers About Electricity Deregulation

Frequently Asked Questions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why were electrical utilities made public in the first place?

In the first thirty years of electricity, utilities were privately owned. Prices were sky high, infrastructure was not built, service was terrible and one in two linemen were killed on the job. When it wasn’t profitable to sell power, they simply shut it off. When utilities were made public, virtually everyone ended up with reasonably priced, reliable power and a high level of service and safety. Everyone profited including big business.

Proponents of privatization say were not going back to the ` 70’s and `80’s of the monolithic monster of Ont. Hydro. What they really want to do is to take us back 100 years when profits were staggering with no public accountability and responsibility.

We as a society seem to be suffering from some kind of group amnesia and have forgotten how we got all our public services including Hydro. All the same arguments using all the same language is being used again to promote privatization. Even in those days statements were made saying that the private sector could do things more efficiently than the public sector.

It’s important to note that Adam Beck, the main player in making electricity go under public ownership and control, was a Tory and an industrialist.

[top]


How were publicly owned electrical utilities taken out of the public’s hands?


One of the Provincial Governments first Bills was Bill 26 the Omnibus Bill. Hidden away in that massive piece of legislation was the elimination of the regulation requiring that any time public assets such as utilities were to be sold, that a vote, a public referendum must be held. Two Star polls recently showed that 91% and 94% of the people completely reject competition and privatization. These polls were unscientific. How about a real public vote?

With the elimination of public, democratic power, it is now much easier to transfer public wealth and assets to the private few. That regulation was put there long ago to protect us from the profiteers. With the stroke of a pen, it very quietly disappeared. This elimination of public input and democracy is evident in every provincial government's Bill since 1995.

[top]


Where are the demands for electricity competition coming from? Who will profit the most?

There are no residential or small business ratepayer’s demonstrations at Queens Park demanding electricity competition. There are no petitions or phone campaigns from the vast majority of electricity customers. The demand is coming from big business and big corporations.

[top]


If electrical utilities are such losers in business, why are investors lining up to buy them?

Everyone won with public power, even big business. Now some of these large corporations aren’t happy. They want more! The winners, under privatization will be private generators, banks and investment houses, lawyers and consultants who will make huge commissions on deals worth billions.

The six corporations who bought power plants in California saw their profit go from 37% to 221%. The losers will be residential and small business ratepayers and hydro workers. Earlier this year, a California judge ordered utilities not to lay off any more workers because they were necessary to keep the power on. Under public power, profits stayed in the community. Under private power, profits will go out of the country into the hands of huge transnational corporations. Why not keep those profits here to pay for things like education and healthcare?

It is interesting to note that some of the big losers are friends of the provincial Government. Owners of companies that are electricity intensive such as mining, pulp and paper, steel and aluminum, car manufacturing and manufacturers of every kind will be very hard hit if the market opens. Many Businesses’ will close because of higher prices and price volatility or they will move to a jurisdiction that has stable, reliable power.

[top]


How will “for profit” electricity be cheaper than “at cost, non-profit”, electricity?

It is fundamentally impossible. A Company that is in business to make profit will do what it takes to maximize that profit. That means that prices will rise sharply, service and jobs will be slashed and safety and the environment will have a low priority.

For more than 90 years that we had “at cost, non-profit” public power, profit was returned to the shareholder in the form of lower and stable rates, a high level of service and a high level of reliability. Prices did not go up during the coldest winter nights or the hottest summer days. (Unlike California or Alberta) How would a “for profit” electrical utility deal with an ice storm?

Even with the problems at Ont. Hydro prices were 30% lower than any neighboring U.S. state. Wasn’t that competitive for our business’ here?

The main reasons why Ontario became the economic powerhouse of Canada is because of our reliable, stable, low priced electricity, our well funded public education and public health systems and all our public services. Now these systems are being cannibalized to increase quarterly profits for the few.

[top]


Is The Privatization of our Electrical system good for the Environment?

This question is really the number 1 question. We all remember last summer with its record number of smog alert days. We can’t ignore the environment anymore. And the answer is absolutely not. When profit becomes the main goal, environmental concerns will go up in smoke. Producers of electricity will not be interested in reducing consumption. They will do everything they can to increase demand so they can increase profits.

Proponents of private power are hiding behind green power with the worst kind of tokenism with wind mills and solar houses. Environmentalists were originally happy with deregulation because they fought for so long and so hard against Ont. Hydro. Now they are starting to see that privatization is going to be much worse.

Our Coalition is not saying to go back to the Ont. Hydro model and we don’t want to go back 100 years to private power. We want to go ahead with a new publicly owned electrical system. One that will concentrate on conservation, harm reduction and harm elimination in electricity production. That certainly won’t happen under private power.

[top]


Has Competition protected consumers against huge price increases in rent, natural gas, gasoline, cable tv, car insurance etc?

Bill 35 was introduced with the promise of “lower electricity rates”. Now the Provincial Government is
admitting that prices will rise but they will manage it. The question at the Bill 35 hearings was “when you add in profit, new taxes, stranded debt payments and commissions to commodities brokers, how will power be cheaper? The standard answer was “increased efficiencies”. No specific details were forthcoming.

In the last 10 years, competition in the U.S. electricity market has not resulted in the building of generation and transmission infrastructure and supply is very tight. Electricity cannot be stored or stockpiled so supply has to be immediately available.

The privateers have heavily criticized the public monopoly. But what happens in competition is, you end up with a private monopoly with profits going to the few. In a public system, profits were returned to everyone in the form of low and stable rates. The 306 municipal utilities were mostly debt free, that number is now down to about 92 because of amalgamations and is projected to be 15.

[top]


Are we going to end up like Alberta and California?

We will be exactly like them; it’s a “for profit” system! Will producers of electricity stop producing until the market price rises? Will service, maintenance and new construction be cut? Will jobs and wages be slashed? Will the environment be improved and protected? The Provincial Government is claiming that we are not like California because our supply of electricity is much greater than theirs. Ontario Power Generation, under the regulations must sell 65% of its generating capacity in the next ten years. OPG claims they can do it in 5 years. What are the supply implications under NAFTA? Once generators of electricity sign contracts with the energy hungry U.S., what will happen to supply here in Ontario? What will happen to the price? Alberta used to have one of the very lowest prices in North America, now they have the second highest next to Hawaii and is now more than triple ours. Electricity is like water. Once the market is open, electricity will be subject to the rules of NAFTA and our sovereignty and control over our own electricity will be gone forever. The provincial Government refuses to answer questions about the implications of NAFTA and the consequences under chapter 11. ( If we wanted to buy back our generating plants under NAFTA we would have to pay for all future profits.)

Supply problems caused by NAFTA will greatly increase our chances of blackouts, just like California. Prices in New York rose this year by 43% for residential users and 46% for commercial users. What will the business friends of the Gov’t say, if that happens to them?

People in Ont. will be forced to bid against electricity prices in neighboring US states, which are 2 to 3 times higher. What will happen to prices and supply here?

[top]


What about Ontario Hydro’s debt?

We can’t afford public power any more is the claim.
Ontario Hydro’s debt is like a mortgage on your house, once it’s paid you have an asset that serves you well. The debt was going to be to be paid off in 12 to 15 years. Wouldn’t most people like to have a 15-year mortgage?

The situation were in, is like buying a house, building up some equity over time, being forced to sell your home far below market value, being forced to rent an apartment and still having to pay the mortgage on your house. Does it make any sense to be paying the debt on assets we no longer own? Normally when businesses are sold the debt and liabilities go to the new owners. Why is Ontario Hydro’s debt not going to the corporations who will make billions?

The debt is going to land squarely on the shoulders of small business and residential ratepayers in the form of new hydro taxes for the stranded debt. These new taxes will likely not end even when the debt is paid off. Big business will not be paying their fair share of the debt. Maybe what Ontario Hydro needed was better managers instead of breaking it up and selling it off.

If you can’t afford public power, you certainly can’t afford private power; it’s way more expensive!

[top]


What about “risks” to ratepayers in building new electricity infrastructure?

Proponents of private power are saying that investors will take all the risks in building new generating plants. The exact opposite is happening right now. Nuclear power plants are being leased to the private sector and when their lease is up, the public is on the hook for the decommissioning costs. The private sector corporations are also legally liable for only $ 75 million in the case of an accident. The joke is that that amount wouldn’t even cover the lawyer’s fees!

They are in effect privatizing profits and making public the risks and the debt! Investors like to invest in sure things. Electricity is a necessity; you can’t live without it. Therefore there is no risk in building electrical infrastructure, everybody needs power to survive and everyone is going to buy it. Investors have a captive market. Why not cover the costs on a non profit basis.

There really needs to be a public inquiry into this dirty deal!

[top]


What about Inflation?

If the market opens the price for electricity will rise sharply, In turn raising the price for every good and service that is produced. What will happen to people on fixed incomes? What will happen to cash strapped hospitals, schools and universities? Tenants and renters? The list goes on and on. Working people will see another decline in their standard of living.

What will downloaded municipalities do with their utilities once the market opens? Many will sell them as quickly as they can.

In conclusion Bill 35 was supposed to “lower electricity prices” and “create jobs”. It is doing the exact opposite. Never mind all the double speak about “increased efficiencies” and “choice”. This is about greed. It is the transfer of public wealth and power to the private few. It makes public the risks and the debt, while privatizing the profits.

People don’t want the delivery of “vision and imagination” that is currently being promised by Hydro One, they want reliable, stable, clean, low priced electricity. Can we afford the big risk to the already shaky economy that electricity deregulation and privatization would bring?

The purpose of the Ontario Electricity coalition is to establish an effective opposition to the deregulation and privatization of electricity in the province of Ontario and our three main goals are:

  • To stop the opening of the electricity market and privatization of our electrical systems.

  • To gain real public ownership and control of these systems.

  • To ensure that the generation of electricity be focused on harm reduction and elimination to the environment through conservation and the use and development of green power.

Ontario Electricity Coalition
890 Yonge St. Suite 502
Toronto, ON M4W 3P4

Telephone:
Toll-Free: 1-866-391-2733
Fax: (416) 968-6836

Email: oec@electricitycoalition.org

© 2001 www.electricitycoalition.org

(editor's note: One change was made to the above document... changed number of questions from 10 questions to 11.)


Urgent Message from EOC

An urgent message from the Ontario Electricity Coalition
It’s not too late to stop electricity deregulation!


Dear friend of public power,

The Provincial Government is planning to deregulate Ontario's electricity in May 2002. If we act quickly and effectively we can stop deregulation. It’s not too late to stop deregulation:

  • the Provincial Government has already postponed de-regulation twice and is in no way obligated to proceed with it

  • deregulation disasters in Cali-fornia and Alberta have shaken he credibility of de-regulation advocates

  • the vast majority of individual and corporate supporters of the Progressive Conservative Party would be adversely af-fected by deregulation - many can be won to speak out against it

  • there is growing concern about economic instability - electricity deregulation would seriously harm an already shaky economy

At last there is an organized op-position to deregulation of electricity in Ontario - the Ontario Electricity Coalition If you are concerned about the impact of soaring electricity rates, about the environment, about privatization, about Canadian sovereignty - join the On-tario Electricity Coalition!

Campaign goal:

To successfully pressure the Provincial Government to aban- don its plans to deregulate and privatize electricity in Ontario.

What’s at stake

  • Soaring electricity rates and reduced reliability would harm individuals, burden public ser-vices and threaten an already shaky economy.
  • Deregulation and privatization would trigger NAFTA clauses that would make it difficult to ever restore Canadian sover-eignty over our electricity supply.

  • Privatization, deregulation and loss of sovereignty would crush hopes for environmen-tally responsible and account-able electrical utilities.

Campaign strategy

Our Primary Targets are members of the Provincial Government. They have the power to give us what we want: a halt to privatization and deregulation of electricity. When planning the campaign, Coalition members asked themselves who the Provincial Government would listen to on this issue. We have concluded that pressure from traditional Government supporters is most likely to persuade it to change course. Therefore, the campaign is focusing on reaching Secondary Targets - people who have influence with the Provincial Government:
industrialists, business people, senior civil servants and politicians at all levels.

We must convince them that:

1. deregulation threatens their interests, and

2. they should take action to stop it.

Of course we want people throughout our communities of natural supporters to speak out against deregulation. But our main organizing challenge is to persuade our allies to approach the Secondary Targets who have influence with the Government. Campaign materials are ready for you to use.

The Ontario Electricity Coalition has prepared a step-by-step Campaign Organizer’s Guide.

  • Campaign materials are ready for you to distribute.

  • Organizing materials such as draft media releases and campaign letters have been prepared to help you build the campaign. A Lobby Guide and lobby materials have been prepared to assist you in approaching influential Secondary Targets in your com-munity.

Please endorse the campaign.

Please fax or email statements of support from individuals and from organizations.

Please make a contribution to the campaign fund.

Please contact a campaign or-ganizer by phone or email to dis-cuss how you can help visit our website:
www.electricitycoalition.org

Help turn the tide, together we can save public power.

Thank you,
Ontario Electricity Coalition

 

back to DAWN Ontario home page